Fraud former attorney Kyleen E. Cane and her cohorts attempt to block the celebration of their long running scheme to pump-and-dump by threatening hosting providers, printing services, and basically anything which promotes the awareness of their con, we, at Asher Madison, have created royalty free copyright open graphics of Kyleen / Michael Cane, Jan Wallace and Amin Andy Lakha for all to enjoy. Al that is needed is the following attribution.
Copyright Asher Madison (firstname.lastname@example.org, www.ashermadison.com) NOT fraud Kyleen/Michael Cane, NOT Jan Wallace, and NOT Amin Andy Lakha.
Fraudster Kyleen Cane uses her attorney prowess to intimidate and pressure entities to remove websites such as these. She has taken and spent great lengths to have this content removed from Scribd, WordPress, going so far as to author her own retaliation content.
Spinning a narrative in which her and her decade long cronies have perfected. Each company having any involvement with Con-woman Kyleen Cane and Jan Wallace have publicly sued them, complained to the Bar Association, and accused them front and center. Now, including the Department of Justice, with wiretaps.
These frauds have no spine and only operate in the filth. Attached is an example of Kyleen Cane’s efforts to retaliate, leaving behind her username and Microsoft Word Document fingerprints (and much more) on the file she “anonymously” uploaded to Scribd, which was taken down as soon as it was reported.
Summary Dynamic Associates Legal Access Technologies Tele-Lawyer Westminster Judgment Kyleen Cane Jan Wallace – Summary of fraud scheme in Cane’s Tele-Lawyer corporation and escape from fraud Westminster judgment. Where Fraudster Kyleen E. Cane starts her shell stock corporation empire prior to her reverse merger pump-and-dump schemes.
Burwell v, MW Medical, Jan Wallace, Case No. 2000-7658 Arizona Superior Court, Maricopa County – 20000525 Burwell v Wallace Amended Complaint – be sure the check out the False Police Reports filed by con-woman Jan Wallace against Burwell where she spews religious slurs.
19830808 American Bank & Trust v Wallace Bank Fraud Brief – Plaintiff appealed from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, 529 F.Supp. 258, Scott Reed, J., which dismissed its action for fraud and deceit in connection with the giving of a promissory note. The Court of Appeals, Cornelia G. Kennedy, Circuit Judge, held that short-term 30-day promissory note given in connection with a commercial loan transaction, which evidenced a loan and not an investment, was not a “security” within meaning of federal securities laws; thus, district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction where action was based solely on federal securities laws.
With most of Kyleen Cane’s motions to sever her trial and dismiss counts against her denied, it seems she’s running out of options.
Involved in a scheme to manipulate trading in four microcap stocks between October 2012 and July 2014, trading patterns resembling illegal pump and dump strategies, Kyleen Cane and her associates’ backs are against the wall with time running out as the trial date nears.
Cane’s best hope now is jury selection, of which she hopes her proposed questionnaire will help her get a favorable jury. Of note is the request for the addition of a question asking if the potential juror has had any prior negative experiences with an attorney (such as Cane) that would affect their ability to hear the case.
Even Cane knows dealing with attorneys like herself would leave a bad taste in people’s mouths.
Cane and her co-defendants go to trial on April 2nd, 2018.
Cane’s lawyers filed a pretrial motion on September 15th to, among other things, have her trial severed from her co-defendants, arguing that defendants DiScala and Josephberg are allegedly involved in four pump and dump schemes while Cane is only involved with one.
Referencing a Supreme Court case, Zafiro v. United States, Cane’s attorneys cited Rule 14 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to justify severing her trial:
If the joinder of offenses or defendants in an indictment…appears to prejudice a defendant or the government, the court may order separate trials of counts, sever the defendants’ trials, or provide any other relief that justice requires.
Cane’s camp further contends that most evidence used against DiScala and Josephberg would be irrelevant at her own individual trial, not to mention that DiScala and Cane will “blame the other for at least part of the allegations contained in the indictment…each will effectively act as a second prosecutor at a joint trial.”